Diplomacy and debacles.
Agnes Helou Middle East Bureau Chief for Breaking Defense reporting
from Beirut said “Despite reports circulating in
the newsmedia that
the White House is in discussions with Saudi Arabia about normalizing relations
with Israel, both Washington and Riyadh have been careful to slow-roll the idea
that any agreement is imminent.” …
“To
be sure, such a normalization would drastically alter the geopolitical dynamics
of the region on a historic scale. But several experts and analysts expressed
varying degrees of scepticism about what could come of negotiations — if
anything — considering the obstacles still in the path to an agreement.
Among the challenges: the need to uphold
Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge, the Palestinian issues, and
Saudi Arabia’s
relations with Iran. Perhaps above all else, the biggest factor, some experts
said, may be
the Kingdom’s understanding that it holds the cards and can try to bleed the
Biden administration for major American concessions ahead of the presidential elections. “
The rest of Ms. Helou’s
report meanders on, quoting numerous expert opinions.
However, in my humble
opinion, most of them are speculative. Suffice
to say that any kind of normalisation agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia
won’t happen now, or in the foreseeable future.
On reconsideration I’ll
mention remarks made by David Des Roches, associate
professor at the Near East South Asia Centre for Security Studies. -
“I think the reports of Saudi Arabia’s
interest in an agreement
should be taken as a maximalist opening gambit in what is likely to be a long
series of negotiations, which will only begin in earnest once both President
[Joe] Biden and King Salman [bin Abdulaziz Al Saud] have left the political
scene.” … “There
is a lack of trust on both sides in this debate, and the type of concessions
which the Kingdom will ask for are probably beyond the ability of the Biden
administration to deliver.”
“The track record here is not promising,” Des
Roches said. “The Saudis have been assured of US support and preferential
access to US weapons in the past, and have been disappointed. In both the Trump
and Obama administrations the
Saudis received assurances that their requests for weapons would be ‘fast
tracked’ through the bureaucracy, only to find that the fast track is still too
slow for them.”
The prime contractor for the
development and production of the Iron Dome is Rafael, who adapted the system
to USMC requirements and assisted with testing support.
Whereas the US marines anticipated the
successful integration of the Iron Dome system, the US Army reluctantly
purchased two Iron Dome systems after acquiescing to pressure from Congress. At
the time, the US army’s top generals claimed the Iron Dome was incompatible
with the US air-defence array.
Apparently, the marines proved them wrong.
Though undoubtedly
important, the Iron Dome Defence System deal is ‘small change’ when compared
with the
$3.5 billion sale of Israel's Arrow-3 missile defence system to Germany approved and concluded recently. US approval of the
deal clears the
way for delivery in 2025 and full operational deployment by 2030.
The deal with Germany
is
Israel's largest
ever defence sale. It is part
of a European arms build-up in response to Russia's war in Ukraine.
According to a
statement issued by Israel's Defence Ministry the full
contract will be ready to sign by the end of 2023. Israel and
Germany will sign a Letter of Commitment, with a $600 million initial payment,
to commence work on the project.
The Arrow-3 is an exoatmospheric hypersonic
anti-ballistic missile, that uses a
detachable warhead that collides with the target. It is designed to
intercept ballistic missiles outside the earth's atmosphere, at an altitude that facilitates the
safe dispersal of any non-conventional warheads. The project is
jointly funded, developed and produced by Israel and the United States.
Undertaken by Israel Aerospace Industries and Boeing, it is overseen by the
Israeli Ministry of Defence and
the U.S. Missile Defense Agency.
A defence ministry
spokesman was quoted as saying that additional German
spending on Arrow-3 could raise the deal's value to $4 billion. The same spokesman added that other countries - which he declined
to name - have voiced interest in the system.
At this juncture it’s important to note that Israel has
repeatedly rebuffed requests to sell arms to Ukraine for fear of antagonising
Moscow.
The
Arrow-3 is
currently Israel’s most advanced long-range missile defence system, Work is
underway on the development of a yet more advanced system, the Arrow-4.
Germany is seeking to
bolster its air
defences amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It
has sought to purchase the Arrow-3 system from Israel for more than a
year now. The deal also came up in a meeting in April between Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
A number of
commentators have emphasised the historic aspect of the Arrow-3 deal concluded seventy-five
years after the defeat of Nazi Germany.
The director general of the Defence
Ministry, Brig. Gen. (res.) Eyal Zamir, said the “landmark deal, the largest
defence export agreement in our country’s history, will propel Israeli defence
exports to a new record, following last year’s remarkable achievement
of $12.5 billion.”
I can’t possibly
conclude without putting a damper on the defence contracts good news.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has instructed
ministers and officials to confirm with him before holding or publicly
reporting on any covert diplomatic meetings. The directive came after
the debacle of Foreign Minister Eli Cohen's meeting in Rome
with his Libyan counterpart. After news of the meeting broke, Libyans took to
the streets in protest and Libyan Foreign Minister Najla
Mangoush was forced to flee to Turkey before being dismissed from her post.
The prime minister claimed he was not informed in advance.
The original Israeli statement said the
country’s foreign minister, Eli Cohen, and Mangoush, his Libyan counterpart,
spoke last week at a meeting in Rome hosted by the Italian foreign minister,
Antonio Tajani.
Israeli officials claimed the meeting was
pre-arranged by the Italian leadership and was not random or accidental, as the
Libyans claimed. The Israeli and Libyan ministers even agreed to make public
statements within a couple of days. Cohen returned to Israel intending to announce details of his diplomatic initiative, but
someone beat him to it and leaked
details of
the meeting to the news media.
When the news broke, the ministry considered
its options and decided to release an official statement late on Sunday, which as it turned out only made matters worse.
Officials informed the government in Tripoli of the pending announcement and
received no pushback from the Libyans.
The riots that ensued surprised officials in both countries. Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid al-Dbeibeh first suspended his foreign minister who was shocked at how quickly she was thrown under the bus and hurried to leave the country by private jet to Istanbul. She was officially relieved of her post the following day after she said that her meeting with Cohen was with the explicit knowledge and approval of her prime minister.
Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen and Libyan Foreign Minister Najla al-Mangoush
Foreign Ministry officials were also critical
of Cohen's conduct. Some told Ynet that he was an amateur in diplomacy. “When Israel's credibility is
compromised, the outreach to other countries in the future will be affected.
Cohen wanted to bring more countries into the peace process, but now he has
shot himself in the foot."
With those assuring
words I’ll conclude.
Have a good weekend.
Beni
31/08/23