A TALE OF TWO CITIES
Instead of writing about our new coalition government
and some of its unsavoury ministers I’ve chosen a topic that’s less profane and
certainly more sacred.
I want
to add a sequel to the saga of the Basilica of the Annunciation
It
seems that the building of the modern church was the catalyst that spurred
Israeli government authorities to further the construction of the Upper
Nazareth Central Synagogue.
In
1957, a design was proposed for the Central Synagogue in Upper Nazareth, with
the aim of providing a religious counterbalance to the churches and mosques in
the Nazareth region. Both the basilica and the synagogue were erected by the
Israeli construction company Solel Boneh and were inaugurated in 1968 and 1969,
respectively.
Upper
Nazareth was established as a new development town in 1956. It was an integral part
of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion’s plan to augment the Jewish population in
Galilee. In a letter written in 1957, Ben Gurion stated that “the new
settlement must be a Jewish town that will assert Jewish presence in the area.
Not a suburb of Arab Nazareth, but a separate town in its vicinity.”
In
spite of Ben Gurion’s plans
and determined efforts, Upper Nazareth has changed
from being a majority Jewish town distanced from its neighbour Nazareth to a
town/city with a mixed population.
According
to Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics the population of Upper Nazareth in November 2022 (estimate) was 44,174.
The increase in population together with other essential attributes was reason
enough for it to be recognised as a city. According to an Upper Nazareth
municipal publication the religious affiliation of the city’s residents in 2019 was: 55.8% Jews, 28.6% Arabs of
whom 18.1% are Christians and 10.5% are Muslims. The missing 15.6% are listed
as “Others,”
described as Jews according to Israel’s Law of Return, but not according to
Halacha.
By
contrast, Nazareth has a population of 72,500, making it the largest city in
the north of Israel. Incidentally,
the Basilica of the Annunciation is claimed to be the largest church in the
Middle East.
In
1960, architect Nahum Zolotov’s design
for the Central Synagogue was selected from among 58
entries in a competition organised by the construction department of the
Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services.
The competition guidelines stipulated that the synagogue
should not compete with Nazareth’s churches in its height or size, but should
be a building that serves the best interests of the town, its citizens and the
environment. The Synagogue’s outstanding feature should be its simplicity. Yet,
despite the difference in size, function, and significance, the synagogue’s
design articulates an implicit, yet consistent, architectural and artistic
dialogue with the basilica.
This
dialogue has motivated a wealth of publications on the topic.
The
construction of the monumental basilica in Nazareth impacted the structure and
design of the synagogue through a dialectic interplay of visual similarity and
separation.
In the
synagogue’s design, the impetus to differentiate the building from other
religious sites in the region is evident from the inverted concrete dome that
covers the building. While the use of exposed concrete reflects a similarity
with the Brutalist style that dominates the interior of the Basilica of the
Annunciation, the inversion of the dome draws attention to the stark contrast
between the synagogue and the church as parallel and yet diametrically opposed
buildings. Indeed, architect Nahum Zolotov stated that the inverted dome was
intended to distinguish the synagogue from Nazareth’s churches and mosques.
Concrete, steel, glass and local stone - the main materials used by Zolotov – are readily available and affordable. They were ideally suitable for constructing the synagogue at that time. Today, architects and their constructors can select from a wider and more versatile range of materials. Despite the limitations Zolotov chose to innovate with what was available. Instead of a towering building with a flat roof or a traditional dome, he decided to challenge accepted construction technology and build the largest dome ever erected in Israel - and then turn it upside down. A large part of the synagogue was constructed below ground level, thus emphasising the inverted dome which projects above ground level. The main entrance to the synagogue descends through a broad courtyard, further accentuating the protruding inverted dome.
The main entrance to the Nof HaGalil Central Synagogue.
The
ever-evolving name of Nazareth Illit demonstrates its increasing efforts to set
it apart from the adjacent historical city of Nazareth. Currently, Nof HaGalil (View of Galilee) is the
city’s official name.
I’m
told that the synagogue has known better days and is hard put to make ends
meet. It receives the same budgetary allocation as
50 other synagogues in the city. As a
result, maintenance and repairs are inadequate.
At
this juncture I want to confess that although I have been to Nof HaGalil/Upper Nazareth many times I
have never visited the Central Synagogue. The references I have made are from
other sources. However, if I have the opportunity, I will visit the synagogue.
I’ll conclude with a brief comment about our
new government that was
sworn in last week. It concerns
a particularly newsworthy incident that many foreign news outlets picked up on.
On Thursday last week
the
Knesset elected Likud MK Amir Ohana as its speaker, shortly before the
confidence vote to inaugurate Israel’s 37th government. Now that’s ground-breaking news in many ways: He was the first openly gay right-wing member of the Knesset and the first
openly gay male from Likud to
serve in the Knesset. He is also the first openly gay person to be appointed as a minister in
the Israeli government and the first openly gay Speaker of the
Knesset.
In his acceptance speech Amir Ohana
thanked his parents and other family members who were seated
in the Knesset gallery, for accepting him “for who I am.”
Ohana promised that the incoming coalition
wouldn’t degrade
LGBTG rights.
“This
Knesset, under the leadership of this speaker, won’t harm them or any other family,” he
said in comments directed toward his family.
Noam party incoming
deputy minister Avi Maoz, looked away during
Ohana’s speech,
as did members of the United Torah Judaism party. Painful as it undoubtedly
was, they were obliged to vote with the coalition government, thereby confirming his appointment as Knesset Speaker.
Columnist
Ben-Dror Yamini applauded the
speech regretting that it was too brief.
” He
should have rambled on filibuster-style
and made them squirm.”
Just as I was about dispatch this post Justice
Minister Yariv Levin dropped a legislative bombshell that would ostensibly manacle
the authority of Israel’s High Court of Justice. I’ll try to include it in next
week’s post.
Hoping 2023 will be a better year for everyone.
Beni 5th of
January, 2023.
No comments:
Post a Comment