Thursday 16 November 2023

After the war.

 

In a piece she wrote for Foreign Policy columnist Amy Mackinnon didn’t leave much room for optimism. Under the heading – “What Gaza’s Future Might Look Like After the War,” she said the monumental challenge of reconstruction will likely cost billions of dollars. Amid periodic outbreaks of hostilities between Israel and Hamas over the past decade, Gaza has been in a nearly constant state of reconstruction. Efforts to rebuild homes and infrastructure destroyed by war have been hamstrung by unfulfilled donor pledges and complicated screening mechanisms put in place to prevent construction materials from falling into the hands of Hamas.”

Israel too is beginning to assess damage caused by the Gaza war and is making budgetary amendments. 

In a press conference held recently, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the 2023-2024 national budget was no longer relevant.

He estimated that the direct cost of the war at about $246 million a day. Smotrich added that he did not yet have an assessment of the indirect costs on an economy partly paralysed by the mass mobilisation of military reservists and civil defence needs.

The finance minister no doubt is consoled by the knowledge that in recent years Israeli arms sales have increased considerably. Furthermore, Israeli air-defence systems are performing exceptionally well, notably the Iron Dome and Arrow 3 systems. Therefore, it’s reasonable to expect an additional increase in export sales of air-defence systems.

Two weeks ago, the Washington Post published an analysis of President Biden’s dismissal of the reported Palestinian death toll in the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip.

“I have no notion that the Palestinians are telling the truth about how many people are killed. I’m sure innocents have been killed, and it’s the price of waging a war. … I have no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using.”

Biden’s dismissal of the ministry’s statistics — that he had “no confidence” in them — was striking. The State Department has regularly cited ministry statistics without caveats in its annual human rights reports. The U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which tracks deaths in the conflict, has found the ministry’s numbers to be reliable after conducting its own investigation. “Past experience indicated that death tolls were reported with high accuracy,” an OCHA official told Glenn Kessler, the Washington Post’s editor and chief writer of The Fact Checker since 2011. Kessler is one of the pioneers of political fact-checking

My comment- Who checks the fact checker who relies largely on OCHA reports?

















UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese


Currently in Australia, heading for New Zealand UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese is bent on gaining support for her insidious mission to demonise Israel.

About the time she received her commission a report by UNwatch titled “Mandate to Discriminate.” (UNwatch is an NGO that analyses and monitors the activities of the United Nations) discovered a serious omission in the conflicts of interest form submitted by Albanese for her UN candidacy. She reportedly failed to declare that her husband, Massimiliano Calì, previously worked for the Palestinian Authority.

 In a stunning exercise in victim blaming, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese has denied that Israel has the right to defend itself against Palestinian terrorism.

“Israel has a right to defend itself, but can’t claim it when it comes to the people it oppresses [or] whose land it colonises,” she tweeted on April 8.

In other words, Ms. Albanese means Israel has no right to defend itself against Palestinian terrorism, depending on which side of the supposed ‘green line’ its citizens are. Only in the Orwellian world of the United Nations, could a senior official put forward such a warped proposition justifying the murder of Jews.
The Israeli government has demanded her dismissal, labelling her language as hate-filled, that of an anti-Semite, and symptomatic of an anti-Israeli mindset that underplays the country’s legitimate security concerns. It refuses to cooperate with her as it has done so with her predecessors. She was appointed to a six-year term in 2022.

Albanese’s arguments have gained traction and a wide audience in Arab and parts of the western media. She argues that Israel cannot invoke the right to self-defence under the UN charter since the threat comes not from a state, but a military group, in a territory that Israel occupies militarily. Israel rejects the idea that it has occupied Gaza since withdrawing its forces in 2005, but the UN and other global bodies consider the occupation to have continued since then as it has maintained effective control over the small territory by land, sea and air.

Israel argues that controlling access to the Gaza Strip is vitally important to ensure its security. Hamas and other terrorist organisations in Gaza have often voiced their intention to annihilate Israel. The closure on Gaza helps prevent arms being smuggled into the enclave.

However, this is just the latest in Ms. Albanese’s long history of relentless, systematic and visceral bias against Israel.

 

The Israel Air Force has dropped leaflets over Gaza that warn civilians to distant themselves from Hamas operatives making clear Israel’s intention to minimise civilian casualties. Since the operation began, Hamas has repeatedly instructed Palestinians to ignore these warnings.

The IDF has gone to extraordinary lengths to protect innocent bystanders

As early as 2006 the IDF began warning the residents of buildings in Gaza that were about to be attacked because they harboured terrorists and their munitions.

Roof knocking was used during the 2008–2009 Gaza War, Operation Pillar of Defence in 2012, and Operation Protective Edge in 2014. In the six months prior to its use, Israel collected data on Hamas members, which they used to issue warnings. Typically, Israeli intelligence officers and Shin Bet security agents contacted residents of a building in which they suspected storage of military assets and told them that they had 10–15 minutes to flee the attack, although in some cases the delay has been as little as five minutes.

In 2016,the US military adopted the Israeli battlefield tactic(roof knocking) in its war against Islamic State. It was used in an attack against an ISIS storage facility in  Mosul, Iraq.  As women and children lived in the house, a Hellfire missile was initially shot at the roof as a warning.

During the 2023 Israel-Hamas war, CNN reported that many people in Gaza said the IDF had abandoned the "roof knocking" policy. In October 2023, a senior Israeli official stated that the practice would no longer be the norm and would only be used under certain circumstances. An IDF officer told the New York Times that instead of the "roof knocking" policy, Israel is issuing mass evacuation orders  and leaflets stating that people sheltering near Hamas terrorists are risking their lives.

In some cases, residents who were warned about an impending bombing climbed up voluntarily to their roofs to show they would not leave. When faced with similar defiance situations, IDF commanders have either called off the bombing or launched a a low-charge warning missile at empty areas of the roof, in order to frighten the people gathered on the roof into leaving the building.

 The New York Times stated that according to Israeli reports, Hamas asked residents to stand on the roofs of buildings to dissuade Israeli pilots from attacking their homes. 

A NATO  report  confirmed the practice, describing it as an example of lawfare.  However, Amnesty International argued that Hamas' purported call may have been "motivated by a desire to avoid further panic" among civilians because Gaza lacked adequate shelters.

The Israeli Government stated "While these warnings, could not eliminate all harm to civilians, they were frequently effective," and that aerial video surveillance by IDF forces showed civilians leaving targeted areas prior to an attack as a direct result of the warnings. In November 2014, the most senior US military official, General Martin Dempsey, cited "roof knocking" as an example where Israel "did some extraordinary things to limit civilian casualties" during Operation Protective Edge.

Israeli officials have said they will take steps to limit civilian casualties, but it fell to a Pentagon official, Dana Stroul, to provide more detail during a hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the Israeli-Gaza war.

"They have dropped 1.5 million leaflets in Gaza asking civilians to evacuate," Stroul said. "They have sent over hundreds of thousands of text messages and made phone calls to cell phones.  In our conversations with the Israel Defence Forces they have made clear they assess collateral damage estimates before they take strikes."

I’ll conclude by thanking the many friends concerned about my safety.

 

Take care.

 

Beni,

   

16th of November, 2023.

No comments:

Post a Comment